Cases 11 - 20 of 646
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dennis McDaniel v. Southern Correctional Medicine LLC
as 24-10079
Plaintiff:
DENNIS MCDANIEL
Defendant:
SOUTHERN CORRECTIONAL MEDICINE LLC, d.b.a. Genesys Health Alliance, HOUSTON COUNTY, GEORGIA and CULLEN TALTON
LOVE v. MACON STATE PRISON, et al
as 5:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LOVE
Defendant:
MACON STATE PRISON, WARDEN MCDANIEL, SPECIAL AGENT WILLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDaniel v. Crabtree et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00744
Plaintiff:
Markel Jason McDaniel
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree, Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Hope v. Brady et al
as 7:2023cv01677
Plaintiff:
Antonio DeVonne Hope, Sr
Defendant:
James Brady, Cecilia Quirindongo, Victoria Ann Valentine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MORADO v. TODD et al
as 3:2023cv24715
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LESTER MORADO
Defendant:
J TODD, J GARRETT, J BUCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDANIEL v. SUPERIOR COURT OF WALTON COUNTY GEORGIA
as 3:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
ECHO LINDSEY MCDANIEL
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF WALTON COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDaniel v. USA
as 1:2023cv00409
Petitioner:
Robert Christopher McDaniel
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
