Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Nuttall v. Michigan City City of et al
as 2:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Tracey Nuttall and Tracey Nuttall personal representative
Defendant:
City of Michigan City, Michigan City Police Officer Matthew Babcock, Michigan City Police Officer Rene Lozano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MCDANIEL v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01315
Plaintiff:
RONALD MCDANIEL
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Caldwell v. McDaniel et al
as 3:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Chase Caldwell
Defendant:
G McDaniel, B Costigan, T Lenover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCDANIEL v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00811
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE A. MCDANIEL
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
CROSSEN v. MARTOCCIA et al
as 1:2022cv02081
Plaintiff:
CHERI D. CROSSEN
Defendant:
JOHN MARTOCCIA, TYLER STILLABOWER, HALEY HOLDRITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REITER et al v. NOEL et al
as 4:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER REITER and TIFFANY NAPIER
Defendant:
JAMEY NOEL, DONOVAN HARRID, BRADLEY KRAMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCCULLAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
JOHN JAVILLO MCCULLAH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, T. J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MCDANIEL v. ATTWOOD
as 1:2022cv00570
Plaintiff:
MALACHI MCDANIEL
Defendant:
JAMES ATTWOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
