Cases 1 - 10 of 15
McLaughlin v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2023cv02072
Plaintiff:
Misty D. McLaughlin
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Adams et al v. Wilson et al
as 2:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
Johnny Adams, Darrel Berkley and Joe McLaughlin
Defendant:
James Wilson, Euro Express LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Mclaughin v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 6:2021cv06048
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Plaintiff:
Tonyia Mclaughin and Tonyia McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Martin v. Stephens et al
as 3:2020cv00069
Defendant:
Independence County, Arkansas, Shawn Stephens, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinney v. Illinois, State of et al
as 4:2019cv00510
Defendant:
Cynthia Raccuglin, Craig Kestenburge, Tim Behr and others
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Pinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaughlin v. Helder et al
as 5:2019cv05085
Defendant:
Deputy Clinton McCarver, Corporal Justin Edens, Sergeant Carlos Pineda and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Craig McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaughlin v. Kelley
as 5:2017cv00295
Plaintiff:
David Edward McLaughlin
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McLaughlin v. Rutledge
as 5:2016cv00290
Plaintiff:
David Edward McLaughlin
Defendant:
Leslie Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McLaughlin v. Jane Doe et al
as 5:2015cv05091
Plaintiff:
Michael Gary McLaughlin
Defendant:
Jane Doe , Southern Health Partners and Tim Helder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaughlin v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2012cv00248
Plaintiff:
Calvin McLaughlin
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
