Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Forte v. McNellis
as 23-7716
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL FORTE
Defendant / Appellee: Detective BRIAN MCNELLIS, Shield #5286, Detective EDWARD GARRITY, Shield #7920, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Mazur et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11992
Plaintiff: Paul Mess, Dennis McEntee, Pasquale Morena and others
Defendant: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Forte v. McNellis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00560
Plaintiff: Daniel Forte
Defendant: Detective B. McNellis, Detective Garrity and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muller v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv01651
Defendant: City of New York, John Doe and James McNellis
Plaintiff: Miklos Muller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shipman v. Minka Technology et al
as 1:2010cv03962
Defendant: Jim McNellis and Minka Technology
Plaintiff: Dennis Shipman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Abarca et al v. 1 World Trade Center, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2005cv08732
Plaintiff: Edgar Abarca, Margoth Abarca, James Lucas and others
Petitioner: Maureen Lucas
Defendant: 1 World Trade Center, L.L.C., 1 WTC Holdings, L.L.C., 100 Church, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Bottone et al v. Bridgeport et al
as 3:2009cv00797
Plaintiff: Timothy Bottone, Mathew Deysenroth, Robert Diaz and others
Defendant: City of Bridgeport, Bridgeport Civ Svc Comm and Ralph Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Type: Civil Rights None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00669
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McNelly v. Reyes
as 1:2008cv00216
Plaintiff: Richard McNelly
Defendant: Melissa Reyes
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?