Cases
Allen v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
as 24-30
Plaintiff / Appellee: PETER ALLEN, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, BRIAN BERNARD, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, MARK DANIELS, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff: SPENCER JACKSON, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, MICHAEL VATTIATO, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and EDDIE FIELDS, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Defendant: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, CARL KOENIGSMANN, MD, JOHN MORLEY, MD and others
Defendant / Appellant: CAROL MOORES, DR.
MELONE et al v. SHORE INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, P.C. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv03243
Plaintiff: Kara MELONE and Paul MELONE
Defendant: SHORE INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, CRYOPORT INC, CRYOPORT SYSTEMS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PALUMBO et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv19238
Plaintiff: DANIEL M PALUMBO, JOSEPH A PALUMBO and GARY GUS PALUMBO
Defendant: MD STEVEN TSAI, MD SHASHANK JAIN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Handy v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 1:2019cv01091
Defendant: Officer Burns, Illinois Department of Corrections, Jean Campanella and others
Plaintiff: James Handy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Oppelt v. Doe et al
as 5:2019cv00050
Plaintiff: Billy Bob Oppelt
Defendant: MD John Doe, II, Bryan Collier and John Doe, I
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Bloomberg et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv07598
Plaintiff: Samuel Ford
Defendant: Michael Bloomberg, City of New York Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Thomas R. Frieden, M.D and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?