Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Stueben v. Meade et al
as 5:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Stueben
Defendant:
Desmond Meade, Contrina Vaughn, Steve Cowart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
VOTO LATINO et al v. HIRSCH et al
as 1:2023cv00861
Plaintiff:
VOTO LATINO, THE WATAUGA COUNTY VOTING RIGHTS TASK FORCE, DOWN HOME NORTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant:
ALAN HIRSCH, JEFF CARMON, STACY EGGERS IV and others
Intervenor Defendant:
PHILIP E. BERGER, TIMOTHY K. MOORE, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CATHEY v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 1:2022cv01018
Plaintiff:
FAUSTINA CATHEY
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC and MEAD JOHNSON NUTRITION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brown Clark v. Meads et al
as 4:2021cv00097
Plaintiff:
Lillie Brown Clark
Defendant:
Daniel Meads, Robert Morgan, Aaron Lewellyn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHOE SHOW, INC. v. LAKE MEAD PARTNERS, LLC
as 1:2021cv00118
Defendant:
LAKE MEAD PARTNERS, LLC
Plaintiff:
SHOE SHOW, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Meads v. USA
as 5:2020hc02240
Petitioner:
Ricky Wayne Meads
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MEADE v. LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON
as 1:2016cv01212
Plaintiff:
LARRY MEADE
Defendant:
LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
SHAMBROOK v. CLINE, et al
as 1:2014cv00869
Plaintiff:
MARK SHAMBROOK
Defendant:
STEVEN BOYD CLINE and MEADE TRUCKING COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunston v. Albert et al
as 5:2014ct03180
Plaintiff:
Richard Dunston, Jr.
Defendant:
E.C. Albert, S.A. Kopesak, D.W. Mead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
