Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Jane Sullivan, et al v. University of Washington, et al
as 23-35313
Plaintiff / Appellee: JANE SULLIVAN and P. POES, 1-75; Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, a Washington public corporation and ELIZA SAUNDERS, Director of Public Records and Open Public Meetings, University of Washington
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC.
Amicus Curiae: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, CALIFORNIANS AWARE, FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION and others
Doe v. Volokh We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1525
Plaintiff / Appellee: JOHN DOE
Intervenor: EUGENE VOLOKH
Defendant: NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and LISBON, NH
Amicus Curiae: ASSOCIATED PRESS, BOSTON GLOBE MEDIA PARTNERS, LLC, CALIFORNIANS AWARE and others
Don Blankenship v. Bradley Blakeman
as 20-1886
Defendant: KEVIN MCLAUGHLIN and DOES 1 THROUGH 50
Defendant / Appellant: BRADLEY BLAKEMAN
Plaintiff / Appellee: DON BLANKENSHIP
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL PRESS PHOTOGRAPHERS ASSOCIATION, VOX MEDIA, LLC, THE MCCLATCHY COMPANY and others
IN RE: JUROR QUESTIONNAIRES IN UNITED STATES V. STONE
as 1:2020mc00016
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ROGER JASON STONE, JR.
In Re: JUROR QUESTIONNAIRES IN UNITED STATES V. STONE
Petitioner: MICHAEL CERNOVICH
Amicus Curiae: TULLY CENTER FOR FREE SPEECH, GANNETT CO., INC., INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY ASSN. and others
Intervenor: JURORS
Martin, et al v. Rollins
as 19-1629
Plaintiff / Appellee: K. ERIC MARTIN and RENE PEREZ
Defendant: WILLIAM G. GROSS, in his Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Boston Police Department and WILLIAM G. GROSS, in his Official Capacity as Police Commissioner for the City of Boston
Defendant / Appellant: RACHAEL SPLAINE ROLLINS, in her Official Capacity as District Attorney for Suffolk County
Amicus Curiae: SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS, NATIONAL PRESS PHOTOGRAPHERS ASSOCIATION, NEW YORK TIMES and others
Juan Machado Amadis v. DOS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-5088
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Justice and United States Department of State
Plaintiff / Appellant: Juan Luciano Machado Amadis
Amicus Curiae: Investigative Reporting Workshop, Reuters News & Media Inc., ProPublica and others
The Washington Post v. David McManus, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1132
Defendant / Appellant: BRIAN E. FROSH, Maryland Attorney General, LINDA H. LAMONE, State Administrator, Maryland State Board of Elections, KELLEY A. HOWELLS, Board Member, Maryland State Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: CARROLL COUNTY TIMES, LLC, d/b/a Carroll County Times, CAPITAL GAZETTE COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED, d/b/a The Capital, GATEHOUSE MEDIA MARYLAND HOLDINGS, INC., d/b/a The Herald-Mail and others
Amicus Curiae: MPA- THE ASSOCIATION OF MAGAZINE MEDIA, INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH, CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER and others
BROIDY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC et al v. MUZIN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00150
Defendant: STONINGTON STRATEGIES LLC, NICOLAS D. MUZIN, GREGORY HOWARD and others
Plaintiff: ELLIOTT BROIDY and BROIDY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
Petitioner: STEVEN RABINOWITZ and BLUELIGHT STRATEGIES
Respondent: RICHARD MINITER, AMERICAN MEDIA INSTITUTE, BENJAMIN WIEDER and others
Interested Party: STATE OF QATAR, UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
NVLSP v. US
as 19-1081
Amicus Curiae: CALIFORNIA NEWS PUBLISHERS ASSOCIATION, RADIO TELEVISION DIGITAL NEWS ASSOCIATION, JUDICATA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM, ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE and NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER
Defendant / Cross Appellant: UNITED STATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02021
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?