Cases 31 - 37 of 37
MERCK & CO., INC. v. SANDOZ INC.
as 3:2009cv00890
Plaintiff:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Defendant:
SANDOZ INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
YOUNG v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2008cv00681
Plaintiff:
HAROLD J. YOUNG, SR
Defendant:
EDITH YOUNG and MERCK & CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
IVAX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. ASTRAZENECA AB et al
as 3:2008cv02165
Plaintiff:
IVAX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA AB and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Merck & Co Inc. v. Ranbaxy Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00229
Plaintiff:
Merck & Co Inc.
Defendant:
Ranbaxy Inc. and Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Anticancer Inc v. Cambridge Research & Instrumentation, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00097
Plaintiff:
Anticancer Inc and Anticancer Inc
Defendant:
Cambridge Research & Instrumentation, Inc., Cambridge Research & Instrumentation, Inc., Cambridge Research & Instrumentation, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Cambridge Research & Instrumentation, Inc., Cambridge Research & Instrumentation, Inc., Cambridge Research & Instrumentation, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Anticancer Inc, Anticancer Inc, Anticancer Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Classen Immunotherapies, Inc. v. Biogen Idec
as 06-1634
Defendant:
THE PERMANENTE FEDERATION, LLC, KAISER PERMANENTE INSURANCE COMPANY, KAISER FOUNDATION ADDED CHOICE HEALTH PLAN, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae:
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA
Defendant / Cross Appellant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLASSEN IMMUNOTHERAPIES, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
BIOGEN IDEC and GLAXOSMITHKLINE
Classen Immunotherapies, Inc. v. GalaxoSmithKline et al
as 1:2004cv02607
Plaintiff:
Classen Immunotherapies, Inc.
Defendant:
Biogen Idec, GalaxoSmithKline, Chiron Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
