Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plunkett v. Ward et al
as 2:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Stephen Chris Plunkett and Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Defendant:
Timothy C Ward, Damon Henninger, William Danforth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caffey v. Hendrix et al
as 2:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Eric Lydell Caffey
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Dewayne Hendrix, M D Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caffey v. Garland et al
as 2:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Eric Lydell Caffey
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Dewayne Hendrix, Sheila Woodard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Strong v. Garland et al
as 2:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
Antonio Strong
Defendant:
Merrick Garland and Shelia S Woodard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shwani v. Mayorkas
as 5:2022cv05082
Plaintiff:
Abdulkarim Shwani
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Ur Jaddou, Marie Hummert and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv05081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Burchfield v. Clark et al
as 4:2021cv00339
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Robert R Redfield, Does 1-4, NLRPD Officers, Arkansas Bar Association Members, General Assembly of Arkansas Members and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley C Burchfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donaldson v. Garland et al
as 2:2021cv00034
Defendant:
Dewayne Hendrix, M D Carvajal, Rosalez and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Julius Donaldson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
