Cases 1 - 10 of 268
MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2024cv01066
Plaintiff:
MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL
Defendant:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and LINA M. KHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
D. v. MGM Resorts International et al
as 2:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Tyla D.
Defendant:
MGM Resorts International, Mandalay Resort Group LLC, MGM Grand Hotel LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sam Antar v. BetMGM LLC, et al
as 24-1364
Plaintiff:
SAM A. ANTAR
Defendant:
BETMGM LLC, BORGATA HOTEL CASINO AND SPA and MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL INC
Mejia et al v. MGM Resorts International
as 2:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Edgar Mejia and Dujun Johnson
Defendant:
MGM Resorts International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Houston v. Golden Entertainment, et al.
as 24-95
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
GOLDEN ENTERTAINMENT, STATE OF NEVADA, DIANNE FERRANTE and others
NOT USED
as 2:2023cv02143
Plaintiff:
Mr. Michael E. Anthony
Defendant:
BELLAGIO, LLC d/b/a Bellagio Las Vegas and MGM Resorts International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Anthony v. Bellagio, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02144
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Anthony
Defendant:
Bellagio, LLC doing business as Bellagio Hotel and Casino and MGM Resorts International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv11222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
