Cases 51 - 60 of 109
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-2726
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Wertz v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2015cv00741
Plaintiff:
Michael Wertz
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Human Services, Robert Gardner, Sarah Witmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Corey Bracey v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, et al
as 15-1674
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY BRACEY
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DR. SAVAADRA, DR. FONDER and others
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
ANDREA MEINTEL, Director Bureau of Treatment Services, RICHARD ELLERS, Director of Bureau of Healthcare, J. BARRY JOHNSON, Deputy Secretary for Western Region and others
DAVIS v. MHM SERVICES
as 2:2014cv06633
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DAVIS
Defendant:
MHM SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corey Bracey v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm
as 14-4248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY BRACEY
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SAVAADRA, FONDER and others
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT FACILITY MANAGEMENT HALL
DAVIS v. MHM SERVICES
as 2:2014cv05962
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DAVIS
Defendant:
MHM SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RAY v. THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2014cv02118
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RAY
Defendant:
THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, MICHELL FARRELL, MHM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
