Cases 1 - 10 of 407
Davison v. Mooney
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Michael Wade Davison
Defendant:
Edward C. Mooney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vanstrom v. Great Divide Insurance Company et al
as 3:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Vanstrom
Defendant:
Great Divide Insurance Company, Nautilus Insurance Group, LLC and Nautilus Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Davison v. Sidders et al
as 3:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Michael Wade Davison
Defendant:
Mattew Sidders, Jason R. Venable and Chrstine B. Joslin
Mattila v. City of Wasilla et al
as 3:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Lonny P. Mattila
Defendant:
City of Wasilla, David Burtch, Robert Cheek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kronberger et al v. Brady et al
as 3:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Lance Kronberger and John W. Rydeen
Defendant:
Michael Brady, Sara Boario, Deb Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Bailey v. Einerson et al
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jackson Bailey
Defendant:
Carol Lynnie Einerson, Michael Zener, Mary LeFavre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMillian v. State of Alaska
as 3:2023cv00282
Petitioner:
Michael L. McMillian
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State Pre-Trial)
Young-God v. Lyou et al
as 3:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Young-God
Defendant:
Chris Lyou and Michael Guzy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flora v. Windy Bay, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Michael Flora
Defendant:
Windy Bay, LLC, The Port Graham Corporation and M/V TRANSPORTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Smith v. Municipality of Anchorage et al
as 3:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Gregory Smith
Defendant:
Municipality of Anchorage, Jessica Willoughby, Dave Bronson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
