Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Michael Berry v. VDOC
as 24-6390
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ALLEN BERRY
Respondent:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD
Berry v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Michael Urese Berry
Defendant:
State of Mississippi and Attorney General Lynn Fitch
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berry v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Michael Urese Berry
Defendant:
State of Mississippi and Attorney General Lynn Fitch
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berry v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Michael Urese Berry
Defendant:
State of Mississippi and Attorney General Lynn Fitch
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berry v. Harford County Disrtict Court Commissioner's Office
as 1:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Berry, Jr.
Defendant:
Harford County Disrtict Court Commissioner's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv01302
Petitioner:
Michael Allen Berry
Respondent:
Virginia Department of Corrections and Virginia Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berry v. Kelly
as 6:2021cv01248
Petitioner:
Michael T. Berry
Respondent:
Brandon Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Berry v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2019cv01535
Petitioner:
Michael Allen Berry
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Berry v. Randy Pfister
as 17-2468
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. BERRY
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDY PFISTER
Michael Berry v. Randy Pfister
as 17-2079
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. BERRY
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDY PFISTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
