Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Kenney v. Binion et al
as 2:2020cv00800
Defendant:
West Virginia D.O.C., Administrator Binion, South Centrel Reganol Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Kenney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenney v. Burdette
as 2:2019cv00021
Defendant:
Lt. M. A. Burdette
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Kenney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenney v. Kanawha County E.M.T. et al
as 2:2019cv00020
Defendant:
E.M.T. Ambulance Department, John Doe 2, E.M.T. Medical Paramedics and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Kenney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. The Sum of $14,225.76 in United States Currency
as 2:2018cv01372
Defendant:
The Sum of $14,225.76 in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Michael Allen Parker
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Looney v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv02052
Plaintiff:
Cindy Looney and Michael Allen Looney
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Tice v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv26459
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Tice
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kading et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv16988
Plaintiff:
Kelli Kading and Michael Allen Kading
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shannon et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv07237
Plaintiff:
Ginger Shannon and Michael Allen Shannon
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv31440
Plaintiff:
Barbara Jean Jackson and Michael Allen Jackson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vaughan v. Sheeley et al
as 5:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Vaughan
Defendant:
John Sheeley, F. Braggs and J. Dugan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
