Cases 11 - 20 of 77
RUFUS v. GEORGIA et al
as 5:2023cv00088
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA and BALDWIN COUNTY SHERIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rufus v. Warden
as 6:2023cv00798
Petitioner:
Micahel Alonza Rufus and Michael Alonza Rufus
Respondent:
Warden and Warden at Petersburg Low Federal Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RUFUS v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 3:2023cv00018
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rufus v. Lou
as 1:2022cv01043
Petitioner:
Michael Alonza Rufus
Defendant:
Warden Lou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00123
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Rufus v. State of Georgia
as 5:2020cv00117
Petitioner:
Michael Alonza Rufus
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RUFUS v. COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES, et al
as 3:2020cv00092
Defendant:
CLAY D LAND, COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES, GEORGIA STATE OF and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rufus v. Courts of the United States et al
as 3:2020cv00695
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Courts of the United States, Horace Johnson, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Alonza Rufus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01394
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Rufus v. United States of America
as 6:2020cv01104
Petitioner:
Michael Alonza Rufus
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
