Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
ANDREWS v. GARMAN ET AL
as 2:2020cv02443
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ANDREWS
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF and M. GARMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION v. LOMBARDI et al
as 2:2020cv00089
Defendant:
IMPLANT RECYCLING, LLC, MICHAEL ANDREWS, ANTHONY A. LOMBARDI and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
ANDREWS v. KELLY et al
as 2:2019cv00107
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREWS
Defendant:
LT. G. DIGUARDI, SGT. CURRAN, JOHN AND JANE DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy v. Borough of Minersville et al
as 3:2018cv01325
Defendant:
Schuylkill County Bar Association, Michael Andrew O'Pake, Fanelli, Evans & Patel, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ssendikwanawa v. Pike County, Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2015cv00545
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Ssendikwanawa
Defendant:
Pike County, Pennsylvania , Craig A. Lowe , Thomas Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
YORI v. ERIE COMMON PLEAS COURTHOUSE et al
as 1:2014cv00296
Plaintiff:
TAMMY YORI
Defendant:
ERIE COMMON PLEAS COURTHOUSE, WESTERN DISTRICT BANKRUPTCY COURT OF ERIE, PA, MICHAEL ANDREW RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01241
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv01196
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ANDREWS v. ROZUM et al
as 2:2011cv07731
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ANDREWS
Respondent:
GERALD ROZUM, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
