Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Asher et al v. Wright National Flood Insurance Company
as 6:2023cv01864
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ASHER and ROBIN ASHER
Defendant:
Wright National Flood Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4000 National Flood Insurance Act
Michael Asher v. USA
as 18-12771
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL ASHER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Asher v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv02782
Petitioner:
Michael Asher
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Asher et al v. Battelle Memorial Institute et al
as 2:2015cv01097
Plaintiff:
Aaron Asher and Michael Asher
Defendant:
Battelle Memorial Institute , Federal Insurance Company and Chubb Group of Insurance Companies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv03458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
USA v. Michael Asher
as 13-10798
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL ASHER
Asher et al v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00079
Plaintiff:
Michael Asher and Linda Asher
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. , Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Timothy Arnett, et al v. County of San Bernardino, et al
as 10-55368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY WAYNE ARNETT and CHRISTOPHE ALEX CHEENEY
Plaintiff:
KAREN CRAFT, individually and as class representatives, RANETTE SANCHEZ, individually and as class representatives, ROSEMARY RYAN, individually and as class representatives and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff:
JACK R. FRISBEE and TIMOTHY S. ROY
Intervenor:
CRAIG IVESTER, MARK TAGOAI, FRANK VANN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, SAN BERNARDINO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and GARY PENROD, Sheriff
Movant:
EDWARD RAMOS, JESSE ESPINOZA, JAMES D. KELLY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
