Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rodriguez v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2023cv02232
Plaintiff:
Nubia Rodriguez
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Michael Sullivan, Michael Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davidson v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2016cv02109
Plaintiff:
Michael Davidson
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco and Officer Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Davidson et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv01735
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc., DOES and Quality Loan Service Corporation
Plaintiff:
Michael Davidson and Monique Davidson
Clyde Spencer v. James Peters, et al
as 14-35737
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLYDE RAYMOND SPENCER
Defendant:
JAMES M. PETERS
Defendant - Appellant:
SHARON KRAUSE, Detective (Clark County) and MICHAEL DAVIDSON, Sergeant (Clark County)
Clyde Spencer v. James Peters, et al
as 14-35689
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLYDE RAYMOND SPENCER
Defendant:
JAMES M. PETERS
Defendant - Appellee:
SHARON KRAUSE, Detective (Clark County) and MICHAEL DAVIDSON, Sergeant (Clark County)
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2011cv00923
Plaintiff:
Clyde Ray Spencer, Matthew Ray Spencer and Kathryn E. Tetz
Defendant:
James M. Peters, Sharon Krause, Michael Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer et al v. Peters et al
as 3:2011cv05424
Plaintiff:
Clyde Ray Spencer , Matthew Ray Spencer and Kathryn E. Tetz
Defendant:
James M. Peters , Sharon Krause , Michael Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Padilla v. Gandara et al
as 2:2008cv00250
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Anthony Padilla
Defendant:
Gilbert Gandara, Michael Davidson and Rodolph Castillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
