Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Voyles v. Management Training Corporation Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00113
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Voyles
Defendant:
Management Training Corporation Inc., Unknown Graham and Unknown Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Voyles v. Management Training Corporation Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01030
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Voyles
Defendant:
Unknown Butler and Scott Marquardt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
August v. Woods et al
as 1:2012cv00015
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward August
Defendant:
Mitch Woods and Naph Care Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payton v. Holman et al
as 3:2011cv00541
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Payton
Defendant:
C.M.C.F. and Unknown Holman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael McCasland v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 11-10395
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD MCCASLAND
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Allstate Texas Lloyds v. Rogers et al
as 3:2011cv00381
Plaintiff:
Allstate Texas Lloyds
Defendant:
Nancy Rogers, Michael Edward Goldman, Billie Raelynn Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
USA v. Richard Goyette
as 10-11282
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD LEON GOYETTE, also known as Michael Edward Jurek, also known as Chris Bently
Johnson et al v. City of Bogalusa et al
as 2:2010cv03444
Plaintiff:
Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
City of Bogalusa, Walter P Reed, 22nd JDC District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Edwards et al
as 4:2010cv03543
Plaintiff:
William Turner
Defendant:
Michael Edwards and Transplus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Jiron v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-20544
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD JIRON
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
