Cases 1 - 10 of 23
TUCKER v. ANTHONY et al
as 5:2024cv01667
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TUCKER
Defendant:
JUDGE JAMES T. ANTHONY, ALFRED STIRBA, EARL C. SUPPLEE, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAY v. HARRY et al.
as 1:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DAY
Defendant:
DR. LAUREL HARRY, PATRICIA THOMPSON, STEVEN SEITCHIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWEN v. MONNIE et al
as 1:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BOWEN
Defendant:
DEBORAH ANN MONNIE, PATRICK NOSKO, LUKE VOGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MNEMANIA, INC. v. FORREST
as 2:2020cv05211
Defendant:
MICHAEL EDWARD FORREST
Plaintiff:
MNEMANIA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
MNEMANIA, INC. v. FORREST
as 2:2020cv05209
Defendant:
MICHAEL EDWARD FORREST doing business as FORREST WALKER FUNERAL HOME doing business as FORREST FUNERAL SERVICES doing business as ROBERT WALKER FUNERAL HOME
Plaintiff:
MNEMANIA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
DUGAN v. BOROUGH OF NANTY GLO et al
as 3:2019cv00071
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS DUGAN
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF NANTY GLO, LYNNE STOCK, DIANE HOLBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAMPSON v. DAVIDSON INVENTOR SERVICE et al
as 2:2019cv00430
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EDWARD SAMPSON
Defendant:
DAVIDSON INVENTOR SERVICE, JOHN DELISSIO and FNU DAVIDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIAMS v. CLARK et al
as 1:2018cv00315
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PAUL ENNIS, EARL JONES, ALEXIS SECARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MICKENS v. CLARK et al
as 1:2018cv00005
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICKENS, SR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL CLARK, JERI SMOCK, CHCA, MICHAEL EDWARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HORSH v. CLARK et al
as 1:2017cv00316
Plaintiff:
CHARLES KEITH HORSH
Defendant:
MICHAEL CLARK, MELINDA ADAMS, JERI SMOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
