Cases 81 - 90 of 137
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gonzalez v. Florida Department of Correctional et al
as 1:2014cv20874
Plaintiff:
Michael Gonzalez
Defendant:
Florida Department of Correctional and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv04903
Defendant:
Police Officer Dean Ambrosio, City of New York, Sgt. Vincent D'Ambrosio and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Merritt v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv04176
Defendant:
City of New York and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10
Shield No. 12364:
Police Officer Michael Gonzalez
Plaintiff:
Antoine Merritt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv01560
Plaintiff:
Michael Gonzalez
Defendant:
United States of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
C. Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Steve Franke
as 13-35452
Petitioner - Appellant:
C. MICHAEL GONZALEZ-AGUILERA
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE FRANKE
Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Peters et al
as 2:2013cv00374
Defendant:
Timothy Clayton, Ms. Howton and Colette Peters
Plaintiff:
C. Michael Gonzalez-Aguilera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Peters et al
as 1:2013cv00374
Defendant:
Timothy L Clayton, Ms. Howton and Colette Peters
Plaintiff:
C. Michael Gonzalez-Aguilera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. USA
as 5:2013cv00010
Petitioner:
Michael Gonzalez
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Jose Gonzalez
as 13-40038
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE MICHAEL GONZALEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
