Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Michael Gross et al v. Guild Mortgage Co. et al
as 2:2009cv03974
Plaintiff:
Michael Gross and Margaret Gross
Defendant:
Guild Mortgage Co., Countrywide Home Loans, Recontrust Company, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Michael Gross et al v. Guild Mortgage Co. et al
as 2:2009cv03972
Plaintiff:
Michael Gross and Margaret Gross
Defendant:
Guild Mortgage Co., Countrywide Home Loans, Recontrust Company, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Straznicky v. Desert Springs Hospital et al
as 2:2009cv00731
Plaintiff:
Martin Straznicky and Martin Straznicky
Defendant:
Desert Springs Hospital, Sam Kaufman, Board of Trustees of Desert Springs Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
USA v. Michael Gro
as 08-35955
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL GROSS
LITTLE v. CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2007cv05361
Plaintiff:
OMAR SHARIF LITTLE
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, MORTON and MICHAEL GROSS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gross v. United States of America
as 2:2007cv00304
Plaintiff:
Michael Gross
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Gross
as 07-5971
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL GROSS
SANTUCCI v. GROSS et al
as 2:2007cv00373
Plaintiff:
SALVATORE SANTUCCI
Defendant:
MICHAEL GROSS, MICHAEL GROSS, ALBERT ROSSI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antik Denim LLC et al v Michael Gross et al
as 2:2007cv00123
Plaintiff:
Antik Denim LLC, Antik Denim LLC, Antik Denim LLC and others
Defendant:
Michael Gross, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies A-Z and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
