Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ELLIS v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, GOBBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUDEK v. REPUBLIC-FRANKLIN INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
ANN M. HUDEK
Defendant:
REPUBLIC-FRANKLIN INSURANCE COMPANY, UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, NORTH EAST TRAILER SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Smith v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 3:2018cv01412
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Smith
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH et al v. TRIPLE B TRUCKING, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00194
Defendant:
GREGORY PETERSON and TRIPLE B TRUCKING, LLC
Plaintiff:
MARCIA SMITH and MICHAEL J. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Smith v. Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency et al
as 1:2015cv08634
Plaintiff:
Michael J Smith
Defendant:
Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency, BMO Capital Markets Corp., BNP Paribas Securities Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Smith v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 3:2015cv00736
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Smith
Defendant:
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv09129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv51879
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Smith
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
as 1:2008cv01274
Plaintiff:
Michael J Smith
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
