Cases 11 - 20 of 24
In re: Alton D. Brown, et al
as 16-2749
Petitioner:
In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Respondent:
GARY L. LANCASTER, J. CURTIS JOYNER, THOMAS J. RUETER and others
Nominal Respondent:
JAMES M. MUNLEY
MINA v. U.S. EASTERN DISTRICT COURT OF PA et al
as 2:2016cv01013
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY STOCKER MINA
Defendant:
U.S. EASTERN DISTRICT COURT OF PA, PETRESE B. TUCKER, MICHAEL KUNZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
In re: Alton Brown, et al
as 15-1616
Petitioner:
In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Respondent:
GARY L. LANCASTER, J. CURTIS JOYNER, THOMAS J. RUETER and others
Nominal Respondent:
JAMES M. MUNLEY
UNGER v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2014cv01402
Plaintiff:
GLENN RICHARD UNGER
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, JACOB J. LEW, JOHN F. KERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alton Brown v. Gary Lancaster, et al
as 14-2670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
J. CURTIS JOYNER, THOMAS J. RUETER, MICHAEL KUNZ and others
Alton Brown v. USDC EDPA, et al
as 14-1834
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, J. CURTIS JOYNER, THOMAS J. RUETER and others
ELLERBE v. MEMEGER et al
as 2:2014cv01919
Plaintiff:
DERRICK J. ELLERBE
Defendant:
D. ZANE MEMEGER, SPECIAL AGENT-IN-CHARGE OF THE FBI, MICHAEL KUNZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Glenn H. Winokur
as 13-3411
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: GLENN H. WINOKUR
Defendant - Respondent:
JOSEPH W. CHESNEY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Not Party - Respondent:
MICHAEL KUNZ
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
MARVIN KATZ
David Lusick v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 13-3115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GEORGE LUSICK
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JUDGE JACQUELINE ALLEN, JOSEPH H. EVERS, Prothonatary and others
Michael Kunz v. Golfsmith USA LLC et al
as 5:2012cv02008
Defendant:
Does and Golfsmith USA LLC
Plaintiff:
Michael Kunz
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
