Cases 61 - 70 of 1,705
James Rockett v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 09-30536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ROCKETT
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Director and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Denial of Application for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
MARSHALL v. CHANDLER et al
as 1:2009cv00100
Petitioner:
Jonathan Marshall, Sr
Respondent:
Rodney W. Chandler, Harley G Lappin, Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-50485
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
THERTULIEN v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2009cv02717
Petitioner:
ROBERTO THERTULIEN
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, HQCDU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ROLAND v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2009cv02388
Petitioner:
BEAUVOIR JEAN ROLAND
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHEAL CHERTOFF, ANDREA J. QUARANTILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
