Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Bates v. Nunley et al
as 3:2012cv00269
Defendant:
Bryant Gumbel, Wachovia Bank/Wells Fargo, Chief Of Police and others
Plaintiff:
Hephzibah Bates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EDWARDS et al v. NEWTON et al
as 2:2011cv07785
Plaintiff:
EMILY EDWARDS and BOBBY EDWARDS
Defendant:
CHERYL NEWTON, MARC MOREAU, THOMAS HOWE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCKENNA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv07092
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM K. MCKENNA
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SHELLEY R. SMITH, MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv02398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PRATT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY et al
as 2:2011cv01346
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND S. PRATT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY , MICHAEL NUTTER , CHARLES H. RAMSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKENNA v. CITY OF PHILA. ETAL et al
as 2:2010cv05561
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM K. MCKENNA
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA. ETAL, PHILA. POLICE DEPT., POLICE PERSONNEL DEPT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
STUBBS v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2010cv03200
Plaintiff:
WELLINGTON STUBBS
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER , EVERETT GILLISON , CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2010cv03455
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MOORE
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, CITY MANAGER DIRECTOR PHILA., DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS PHILA. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELISRA, LLC v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv01583
Plaintiff:
ELISRA, LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , MICHAEL NUTTER and FRANCES BURNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
