Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Hattori et al v. Anand et al
as 1:2023cv11043
Plaintiff:
Mark Hattori and Susan Newman
Defendant:
Gaurav Anand, Matthew Christensen, Lydia Jett and others
MITCHELL et al v. WALMART et al
as 2:2023cv22453
Plaintiff:
IVANNA MITCHELL and MICHAEL PARKER
Defendant:
WALMART, JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ COMPANIES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
PARKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv17501
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PARKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BELLINGER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12888
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PARKER BELLINGER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bryan v. Kim et al
as 1:2023cv07445
Plaintiff:
Aimee Bryan
Defendant:
Bom Suk Kim, Neil Mehta, Benjamin Sun and others
Nominal Defendant:
Coupang, Inc.
Tang v. Kim et al
as 1:2023cv07239
Plaintiff:
Kia Tang
Defendant:
Bom Suk Kim, Gaurav Anand, Neil Mehta and others
Nominal Defendant:
Coupang, Inc.
Westbrook v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02094
Plaintiff:
Rachel Westbrook
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Kirk Fields, Michael Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Armendariz et al v. Sig Sauer, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00536
Plaintiff:
Fernando Armendariz, Miriam Trebino, Matthew Breedon and others
Defendant:
Sig Sauer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gilbert v. Glass et al
as 2:2022cv04564
Plaintiff:
Oneil Gilbert, III
Defendant:
Sgt Glass, Capt. Wilkie, Dep. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00957
Petitioner:
Michael Blaine Parker and Michael Parker
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
ISP (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
