Cases 1 - 10 of 19
David Whitehead v. President William Clinton, et al
as 21-1976
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Howard University, New Line Cinema and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Louis Whitehead
David Whitehead v. President William Clinton, et al
as 21-1671
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Howard University, New Line Cinema and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Louis Whitehead
Horton v. Rankin et al
as 1:2017cv02695
Plaintiff:
Gale Millard Horton
Defendant:
Michael Rankin, Denver Human Services, Jefferson Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Franzen v. Ely-Fernandez et al
as 1:2016cv00453
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Franzen
Defendant:
Erin Ely-Fernandez, Gail Nichols , Ninth Judicial District, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Potter v. Villasenor et al
as 4:2015cv00562
Plaintiff:
Anthony Potter
Defendant:
Roberto Villasenor, Michael Ortega, Jonathan Rothschild and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Potter v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2015cv00420
Defendant:
Tucson, City of , Jonathan Rothschild, Paul Cunningham and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Geary Potter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankine v. Dantiste et al
as 9:2015cv80275
Plaintiff:
Michael Rankine
Defendant:
Yanick Dantiste, John L. Phillips, Krista Marx and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Pima County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2013cv01779
Plaintiff:
Daniel Patterson
Defendant:
Pima County Sheriff's Department, Tucson, City of, Clarence Dupnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Whitehead v. White & Case, L.L.P., et al
as 12-30757
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LOUIS WHITEHEAD
Defendant - Appellee:
WHITE & CASE, L.L.P., WALLPARK, L.L.C., PAUL FREEMAN and others
Steven Montes v. State of Arizona, et al
as 12-16515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN ARTHUR MONTES
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, CITY OF TUCSON, COUNTY OF PIMA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
