Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 143
Watts v. Novak, et al.
as 24-3151
Plaintiff: MICHAEL RAY WATTS
Defendant: LOGAN NOVAK, STEVEN JOSEPHSON, Deputy, KELLAN FEYERHARM, Corporal and others
(PC) Chavez v. St. Andre et al
as 2:2024cv01384
Plaintiff: Michael Ray Chavez
Defendant: Rob St. Andre, Mitchell Knedler, Darrow Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Ray Armijo v. Edward Borla
as 8:2024cv00719
Petitioner: Michael Ray Armijo
Respondent: Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duggin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00379
Plaintiff: Michael Ray Duggin
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Fuqua v. Thornell
as 3:2023cv08621
Petitioner: Michael Ray Fuqua
Respondent: Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Trisler et al
as 1:2023cv00293
Plaintiff: Jason Ray Clark
Defendant: Michael Ray Trisler and Brian Paul Trisler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Michael Fuqua v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15888
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL RAY FUQUA
Respondent / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Respondent: UNKNOWN PARTY
Swanson v. United States We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00810
Plaintiff: Michael Ray Swanson
Defendant: United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Swanson v. Danielson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00754
Plaintiff: Michael Ray Swanson
Defendant: Kevin Danielson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Michael Fuqua v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15498
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL RAY FUQUA
Respondent / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Respondent: UNKNOWN PARTY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?