Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Sprague et al v. Covelo et al
as 2:2025cv02795
Plaintiff:
Michael Sprague and Armand Torres
Defendant:
Patrick Covelo, State of California and California Dept of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sprague et al v. Covelo et al
as 2:2025at01290
Plaintiff:
Michael Sprague, Armand Torres, Armand Torres as Successor of Interest to the Estate of Stephanie Brinson and others
Defendant:
Patrick Covelo, State of California and California Dept of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPRAGUE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09320
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SPRAGUE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRAY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08807
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BRAY, ROBERT DAVIES, STEVEN ALON FLOWERS HART and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bray et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00941
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bray, Robert Davies, Steven Alon Flowers Hart and others
Defendant:
3M Company
SPRAGUE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv26804
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SPRAGUE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barone v. State of New Jersey et al
as 0:2020cv62433
Defendant:
Officer Lookner, City of Long Branch Police Dept., Brent DiMarco of the Timothy Law Firm and others
Plaintiff:
Samantha J Barone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPRAGUE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv51154
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SPRAGUE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
