Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Springfield v. Ajanta Pharma USA Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv11946
Plaintiff:
Michael Springfield
Defendant:
Ajanta Pharma USA Inc., Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC, Apotex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McDonald v. Springfield et al
as 5:2018cv00093
Plaintiff:
Johnny A. McDonald
Defendant:
Michael Springfield, Jared Thompson, Brendan Inglish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abercrombie, et al v. Aetna Health, et al
as 16-1152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAD ABERCROMBIE, TRENT ARTICHOKER, TROY BARRON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AETNA HEALTH, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation, ANTHEM BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD, a Colorado corporation, CIGNA HEALTHCARE OF COLORADO, INC., a Colorado corporation and others
Abercrombie et al v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare of Colorado, Inc et al
as 1:2015cv00994
Plaintiff:
Chad Abercrombie , Robert Arne , Trent Artichoker and others
Defendant:
Aetna U.S. Healthcare of Colorado, Inc , OptumHealth Care Solutions, Inc. , Landmark HealthCare Colorado, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Springfield v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv01338
Plaintiff:
Michael Springfield
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
DIXON v. SPRINGFIELD et al
as 2:2013cv02640
Plaintiff:
LATOYA DIXON
Defendant:
MICHAEL SPRINGFIELD and PREFERRED PARTY RENTALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Patterson et al v. Board of County Commissioners for the County of Sandoval et al
as 6:2007cv00019
Plaintiff:
William Patterson and Denise Patterson
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners for the County of Sandoval, Brad Stebleton, David Mathews and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
