Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Michael Gorbey v. Geisinger Eye Center Owners & Rueters, et al
as 24-1590
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY, aka Michael Feather-Gorbey aka Michael Owl Feather Gorbey
Defendant:
GEISINGER EYE CENTER OWNERS & RUETERS, PATRICIA S. DODSZUWEIT, Clerk of Court U.S. App.Ct. 3rd Cir., J. OLSON, Ophthomology Doctor Geisinger Eye Center and others
STEVENS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv03122
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVENS
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, CASTRO and WELLPATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEVENS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01395
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVENS, JOSE RICARDO BURGOS RESTO, HECTOR TOLENTINO and others
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, WELL PATH, DR. IBRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON et al v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01087
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMPSON and MICHAEL STEVENS
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, LT NAJAD, CASRRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cech v. Sage
as 1:2022cv00715
Petitioner:
Michael Steven Cech
Respondent:
Warden Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Michael Gorbey v. S. Spaulding, et al
as 22-1692
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN S. SPAULDING, USP Lewisburg, CAPTAIN J. KONKLE, USP Lewisburg, SHU LT. SHIRK and others
CARPENTER v. GRAB et al
as 3:2022cv01722
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. CARPENTER
Defendant:
MICHAEL STEVEN GRAB and NIKOLAUS & HOHENADEL, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv05253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Michael Gorbey v. Warden Lewisburg USP
as 21-3081
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP
Michael Gorbey v. Warden Lewisburg USP
as 21-3082
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
