Cases 1 - 10 of 11
ELLIOTT et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01741
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ELLIOTT, ANTWAIN JONES, ANTHONY STEWART and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OWENS et al v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01613
Plaintiff:
DAVID OWENS, DAVID HOWARD, MICHAEL WILSON and others
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEHAAN et al v. TOP SHOT FIREARMS SIMULATOR, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DEHAAN and JONATHAN SHERRILL
Defendant:
TOP SHOT FIREARMS SIMULATOR, INC. and MICHAEL WILSON
Counter Claimant:
MICHAEL NELLINGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
DAVIS v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2014cv00022
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and T. MICHAEL WILSON
Plaintiff:
ANDREW DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUDKINS v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2013cv01179
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and T. MICHAEL WILSON
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HUDKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00137
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WILSON v. MCKINNEY
as 1:2010cv01080
Defendant:
LARRY J. MCKINNEY
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01054
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01021
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WILSON v. CARSON
as 1:2010cv00714
Defendant:
ANDRE CARSON
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
