Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Jill Bezek v. First National Bank of Pennsylvania
as 23-310
Petitioner:
JILL BEZEK and MICHELLE HARRIS
Respondent:
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA, First Mariner Bank, successor in interest to First Mariner Bank by and through merger with Howard Bank
Harris-Shields v. Dotdash Meredith, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00851
Plaintiff:
Michelle Harris-Shields
Defendant:
Dotdash Meredith, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Harris-Shields v. Dotdash Meredith, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00854
Plaintiff:
Michelle Harris-Shields
Defendant:
Dotdash Meredith, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
United States v. Michelle Harris
as 22-3388
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Michelle Harris
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00767
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
King et al v. Habib Bank Limited
as 1:2020cv04322
Plaintiff:
Kevin King, Luke Spehar, Kade M. Osborn and others
Defendant:
Habib Bank Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00543
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00455
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
OLIVANT et al v. VARGAS et al
as 2:2018mc00069
Movant:
CARLIE OLIVANT , BRENDA LOTT and GAIL SLOMINE
Respondent:
OMAR VARGAS, ROBERT BERTONE, MICHELLE HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Type:
Other Statutes
Omar Vargas, et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 17-56764
Plaintiff / Appellee:
OMAR VARGAS, ROBERT BERTONE, MICHELLE HARRIS and others
Appellant:
GINA DEBOSE, Lead "Opt-Out" Appellant, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, RACHEL WILSON, ANGELA BLAKESLEE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
