Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Perez v. The State of Florida
as 6:2013cv00024
Plaintiff:
Wascar Miguel Perez Perez
Defendant:
The State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. The State of Florida
as 8:2013cv00067
Plaintiff:
Wascar Miguel Perez Perez
Defendant:
The State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez-Velazquez v. Old Colony Correctional Center et al
as 1:2012cv11926
Plaintiff:
Miguel Perez-Velazquez
Defendant:
Old Colony Correctional Center, Geri Riendeau, Rebecca Lubelcyzk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miguel Perez v. James Fenoglio, et al
as 12-3084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES FENOGLIO, Doctor, PHILLIP MARTIN, Health Care Administrator, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED and others
USA v. Mike Perez
as 12-1608
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIKE PEREZ, AKA Miguel Perez-Cintron, AKA Miguel Perez
USA v. Mike Perez
as 11-4349
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIKE PEREZ, AKA Miguel Perez-Cintron, AKA Miguel Perez
Jose Perez v. Conner Blaine, et al
as 11-4230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MIGUEL PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CONNER BLAINE, Superintendent, ATTY GEN PA and DA LANCASTER
Perez v. Fenoglio et al
as 3:2011cv00819
Plaintiff:
Miguel Perez
Defendant:
James Fenoglio, Phil Martin, Wexford Health Sources, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruvalcaba v. Fong et al
as 4:2010cv00964
Plaintiff:
Miguel Perez Ruvalcaba
Defendant:
Terry Fong and Mary Fukay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. USA
as 5:2009cv00269
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Miguel Perez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
