Cases 11 - 20 of 70
BANKS v. HICKMAN et al
as 2:2015cv01342
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DAVID HICKMAN, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. CONTI et al
as 2:2015cv01341
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
JOY FLOWERS CONTI, US DIST COURT FOR THE WEST DIST OF PA, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez v. Doyle et al
as 2:2014cv14443
Defendant:
Mike Doyle , Doyle Masonry , Michael Doyle and others
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Chavez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Siers v. Young et al
as 4:2014cv04087
Plaintiff:
Donovan Craig Siers
Defendant:
Darin Young, Robert Dooley, Patrick MaGorian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks v. U.S. District Court for the Western District of PA et al
as 1:2014cv00452
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
U.S. District Court for the Western District of PA, Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Nygaard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Banks v. CIA, et al
as 14-1219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DIRECTOR CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED NATIONS, EUROPEAN UNION and MEXICO EMBASSY
Banks v. Obama et al
as 1:2013cv03084
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
S. O., M. O., Director Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2013cv03014
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Director of Central Intelligence, National Security Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
