Cases 71 - 80 of 81
Unite Eurotherapy, Inc. v. Sleekhair.com, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv02629
Plaintiff:
Unite Eurotherapy, Inc.
Defendant:
Sleekhair.com, Inc. and Mike Lee
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Lindsey v. President of the Board of Supervisor of Scott County et al
as 3:2010cv00567
Plaintiff:
Randy Carl Lindsey
Defendant:
President of the Board of Supervisor of Scott County, Mike Lee, Staff Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Ronald et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv05740
Defendant:
James Agate, Recon Trust Company, CTC Real Estate Services and others
Plaintiff:
Adnan Torlak, Johannes Wertti, India Graf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harper et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2010cv00134
Plaintiff:
James Harper and Katrina Wansley
Defendant:
Mike Lee, Joe Rifby, Unknown Arresting Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Irwin v. Lee
as 3:2009cv00775
Plaintiff:
Justin Lee Irwin
Defendant:
Mike Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Lee
as 3:2009cv00754
Plaintiff:
Maurice Orlando Brown
Defendant:
Mike Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepard v. Lee
as 3:2009cv00755
Plaintiff:
William Charles Shepard
Defendant:
Mike Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burks v. Lee
as 3:2009cv00753
Plaintiff:
Octavious Demetrice Burks
Defendant:
Mike Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haralson v. Lee et al
as 3:2009cv00700
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Lachun Haralson
Defendant:
Mike Lee, Brad Carson and Sammy Lovett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gillilan v. Edenfield et al
as 6:2009cv00027
Plaintiff:
Gregory Gillilan, Mike Lee and George Whitt
Defendant:
Amenda Edenfield, Shuemake and 1st Shift Prison Guards
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
