Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Wood v. Benson et al
as 7:2017cv03052
Plaintiff:
Mike Wood
Defendant:
Karl Benson and Sun Belt Conference, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gullett-El et al v. Corrigan et al
as 3:2017cv00881
Plaintiff:
Taquan Rahshe Gullett-El, Syteria Hephzibah-El and Aamaru Alien Religious Consul Association
Defendant:
Timothy J. Corrigan, Sean Patrick Flynn, W. Stephen Muldrow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HILL v. HANKINSON et al
as 4:2017cv00034
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN R HILL
Defendant:
JAMES HANKINSON, MIKE WOOD, PATRICK BRIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Smith v. Mike Woods, et al
as 17-10061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES DOUGLAS SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE WOODS, Leon County Sheriff, E. BUTLER, Deputy, ROBINSON, Nurse and others
Smith v. Woods et al
as 3:2017cv00015
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
Mike Woods, Leon County, (f/n/u) Helms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANDLER v. WOOD et al
as 4:2016cv00772
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LASHUN CHANDLER
Defendant:
MIKE WOOD and KIMBERLY PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WOODS et al
as 4:2016cv00771
Plaintiff:
JAMES DOUGLAS SMITH
Defendant:
MIKE WOODS, CITY OF TALLAHASSEE MAYOR, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WOODS et al
as 4:2016cv00757
Plaintiff:
JAMES DOUGLAS SMITH
Defendant:
MIKE WOODS, E BUTLER, ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stock et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 2:2016cv02795
Plaintiff:
Gene Stock , Arthur S. Nichols, Jr. , Jay Nichols and others
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Syngenta Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stock et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 4:2016cv00231
Plaintiff:
Gene Stock , Arthur S. Nichols, Jr. , Jay Nichols and others
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Syngenta Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
