Cases 1 - 10 of 1,761
Wiley v. Meracle et al
as 3:2024cv01348
Plaintiff:
Dannie Wiley
Defendant:
Seth Meracle, Johnnie Smith, Mac-Shane Frank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Roberson et al
as 1:2024cv04021
Plaintiff:
Drew Logan
Defendant:
J.D Roberson, D.R Clark, LeAnn Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Galor et al
as 3:2024cv50179
Plaintiff:
John Hall
Defendant:
Patric Galor and Ben Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan Dyjak v. Grace Hou, et al
as 24-1816
Plaintiff:
LOGAN DYJAK
Defendant:
GRACE HOU and LANA MILLER
COOKE v. MILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA COOKE
Defendant:
SHERIFF BRENT MILLER, CHIEF DEPUTY BRADLEY SHEPHERD, JAIL COMMANDER BRADLEY SEACAT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimmie Miller v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 24-1769
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE D. MILLER
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., EVARISTO AGUINALDO, Doctor, MARIAM ABRAHAM and others
Bailey v. Weiland et al
as 2:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Steven A Bailey
Defendant:
Michael Weiland, Keith Miller, Allan Tenhakn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Tims et al
as 2:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Steven Miller Johnson
Defendant:
Shana Tims, Nicole McDade and Wisconsin Department of Corrections Division of Community Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan Dyjak v. Stacey Horstman, et al
as 24-1675
Plaintiff:
LOGAN DYJAK
Defendant:
STACEY HORSTMAN, JO-AN LYNN and LANA MILLER
MILLER et al v. VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JAMES MILLER, LEVI DC GILLIS and JUSTIN MICHAEL BLUEHER
Defendant:
VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, FUNKHOUSER and LOHR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
