Cases 21 - 30 of 90
London v. Miller et al
as 4:2017cv04165
Plaintiff:
Laura London
Defendant:
Darrell Miller, Steve Smith, Scott Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Berryhill
as 5:2017cv05087
Plaintiff:
Roxie Lee Miller
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shaw v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2017cv04116
Plaintiff:
James Elmer Shaw
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Robert Dooley, Darin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdulrazzak v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2017cv04058
Plaintiff:
Haider Salah Abdulrazzak
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Aaron Miller, SD. Bd. of Pardons and Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gunderson et al v. Miller et al
as 5:2016cv05113
Plaintiff:
Roger Gunderson , Marcella M. Gunderson and Two Reverse E, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Jim E. Miller, Nylla Miller, Bonnie R. Bowers and others
Counter_claimant:
Continental Resources, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Marcella M. Gunderson , Roger Gunderson and Two Reverse E, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Kiir v. Vanderhule et al
as 4:2016cv04041
Plaintiff:
Diw Bol Kiir
Defendant:
Chase Vanderhule, Michael Miller and Lyndee Kamrath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Days Inns Worldwide, Inc. v. Miller
as 3:2016cv03004
Plaintiff:
Days Inns Worldwide, Inc.
Defendant:
Greg Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kiir v. Vanderhule et al
as 4:2015cv04164
Plaintiff:
Diw Bol Kiir
Defendant:
Chase Vanderhule, Michael Miller and Lyndee Kamrath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv01138
Plaintiff:
Douglas G. Miller
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Syngenta Seeds, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kiir v. Vanderhule et al
as 4:2015cv04139
Plaintiff:
Diw Bol Kiir
Defendant:
Chase Vanderhule, Sioux Falls Police Department, State of South Dakota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
