Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Mize et al v. Mehta et al
as 2:2021cv02616
Plaintiff:
Mr. Owen Mize and Christy Weaver Sumrall
Defendant:
Nicket Mehta and Bhargesh P Mehta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Mize et al v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
as 3:2019cv00270
Plaintiff:
Rick Mize and Beverly Mize
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00091
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
Kurtz v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01028
Plaintiff:
Walter Kurtz, Bobbie Waynick, David Wilson and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Lynch v. Jarnigan et al
as 2:2015cv00111
Plaintiff:
Logan Lynch
Defendant:
Esco Jarnigan, Wayne Mize and Teresa Laws
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Hamblen County Sheriff's Office and Jail et al
as 2:2015cv00096
Plaintiff:
Darries Jackson
Defendant:
Hamblen County Sheriff's Office and Jail, Esco Jarnigan, Wayne Mize and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Worley v. Jarnigan et al
as 2:2015cv00092
Plaintiff:
Tyler B Worley
Defendant:
Esco Jarnigan, Wayne Mize and Hubert Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00053
Plaintiff:
William L. Jenkins
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Derrick Schofield, Arvil Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Askew et al v. Plummer et al
as 1:2013cv02381
Plaintiff:
Judah Askew , Latricia Askew and S. A.
Defendant:
James Plummer, Mize Granite Sales, Inc and Deborah Parsons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
