Cases 1 - 10 of 43
MONK v. LAURENS COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 3:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE MONK, JR
Defendant:
LAURENS COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Sheriff Larry Dean and CAPTAIN DONELLE PEACOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONK v. LAURENS COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 5:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE MONK, JR
Defendant:
LAURENS COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, SHERIFF LARRY DEAN and CAPTAIN DONELLE PEACOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westberry v. Altfield et al
as 1:2023cv20607
Plaintiff:
Deoin Westberry
Defendant:
William Altfield, Olivia Issertell, Tara L. O'brien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Murray et al
as 4:2022cv00736
Plaintiff:
Lucas Bradley Adams
Defendant:
Sheriff Bill Murray, Paul Monk, Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley v. Murray et al
as 4:2022cv00536
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Talley
Defendant:
Bill J Murray, Paul Monk and QCHC Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 22-10632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, former Commissioner, HOMER BRYSON, former Commissioner and others
Dees v. Lamar et al
as 2:2020cv01326
Defendant:
Richardson, O Walker, Tomlin and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dennis Dees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaines v. Hines et al
as 2:2020cv01190
Defendant:
Monk, Hines, Cutts, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip J Gaines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
