Cases 41 - 50 of 1,592
Johnson #753595 v. Curler et al
as 1:2023cv00991
Plaintiff:
Darren Deon Johnson #753595
Defendant:
Unknown Curler, Unknown Sprague, C. Bandt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Fitz
as 3:2023cv01165
Petitioner:
Adarion Morris
Respondent:
Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Integrity Express Logistics, LLC v. Lopez et al
as 1:2023cv00589
Plaintiff:
Integrity Express Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
Dylan A. Lopez, Luke R. Morris and L Morris Enterprises LLC doing business as Vanir National LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Stampone #713769 v. Michigan Supreme Court et al
as 1:2023cv01166
Plaintiff:
Frederick Stampone #713769
Defendant:
Michigan Supreme Court, Julie Clement, Michigan Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2023cv02866
Plaintiff:
Tracy Rodgers
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Jane/John Doe, Ms. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Jason Pego
as 23-1951
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JASON MORRIS PEGO
Morris v. Obion Co. Jail
as 1:2023cv01181
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lynn Morris
Defendant:
Obion Co. Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhea et al v. Morris-Shea Bridge Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01042
Plaintiff:
David Rhea, Melvin Schuster and Tennessee Valley Operating Engineers Health Fund
Defendant:
Morris-Shea Bridge Company, Inc. and Adam Kimmich
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Jim Miller Furniture, Inc. v. Morris Furniture Company
as 3:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Jim Miller Furniture, Inc.
Defendant:
Morris Furniture Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
