Cases 11 - 20 of 863
Hurst v. Pike County Jail
as 5:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Hurst
Defendant:
Pike County Jail, Suzanna Morris, Herbert Young and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Navarro County Justice System et al
as 3:2023cv02631
Plaintiff:
Broderick Hall
Defendant:
Navarro County Justice System, Hays, Corsicana Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Cain
as 23-60591
Petitioner / Appellant:
Christopher Morris, also known as Christopher Jermaine Morris
Respondent / Appellee:
Burl Cain, Commissioner of Mississippi Department of Corrections
Bullock v. Crane et al
as 4:2023cv04236
Plaintiff:
Brian Bullock
Defendant:
David Crane, Jason Brown, Isaiah Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Cerliano
as 6:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
Anthony Norman Morris
Defendant:
Maxey Cerliano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odem v. Townsend
as 23-40583
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Benny R. Odem, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Lonnie E. Townsend, Senior Warden, Major Michael A. Collum, Assistant Warden, Melissa J. Mortensen, Case Manager II and others
Guillot v. Wade et al
as 3:2023cv01369
Plaintiff:
Dylan Guillot
Defendant:
Warden Wade, Asst Warden Dear, Deputy Warden Cupp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. USA
as 1:2023cv00323
Petitioner:
Darrell Ray Morris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Morris v. FCI El Reno
as 4:2023cv00999
Petitioner:
Tom Morris and Tom Franklin Morris
Respondent:
FCI El Reno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Morris v. Parole Board
as 3:2023cv02199
Plaintiff:
Fred Morris
Defendant:
Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
