Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Nobblen v. Harry et al
as 4:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
William Nobblen
Defendant:
Laure Harry, Kathy Brittain, County of Philadelphia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerome Washington v. Gilmore, et al
as 23-1639
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GILMORE, MR. HAMMER, PA-C, CHCA STEPHANIE WOOD, BSN, MBA, CCHP and others
MINOR v. FINLAYSON et al
as 2:2021cv03744
Plaintiff:
MARCHESU MINOR
Defendant:
LEAH M. FINLAYSON and P.C.A MS SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RASHID v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv05947
Defendant:
G. SHAFFER, FRANK B. WILLIAMS, C.O. SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
AMIN A. RASHID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerome Washington v. Superintendent Gilmore, et al
as 19-3808
Defendant / Appellee:
CHCA NICHOLSON, CHCA STEPHANIE WOOD, BSN MBA, CCHP, PA-C HAMMER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv01558
Defendant:
DIRECTOR MS. SMITH, CHCA STEPHANIE WOOD, Mr. HAMMER and others
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
OKE v. BIGGINS et al
as 1:2018cv00214
Defendant:
DR. M., JANE/JOHN DOE 1, JANE/JOHN DOE II and others
Plaintiff:
AYODELE OKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
YOUGH v. ADMINISTRATOR DAVIS et al
as 2:2017cv06366
Plaintiff:
STANFORD YOUGH
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR DAVIS, CINDY FORD, CONNIE O. KARCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv01068
Petitioner:
JAMES MITCHELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, J.T. SHARTLE, UNIT MANAGER GINVILLE A-UNIT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ivan Mendez v. Jane Doe
as 12-2783
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN L. MENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE DOE, The Mental Health Counselor and Clinical of 1-1 Building a/k/a Ms. Smith
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
