Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Muhammad Akbar, Sr. v. Ashanti Publishing Group, et al
as 23-16118
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MUHAMMAD JALAL-DEEN AKBAR, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
ASHANTI PUBLISHING GROUP, ANTONIO EUGENE MOSES and ARTHUR A. CAPPILLA
Muhammad Akbar, Sr. v. U.S. Parole Commission, et al
as 21-55771
Petitioner / Appellant:
MUHAMMAD JALAL-DEEN AKBAR, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and JENKINS, Warden
Muhammad Jalal Deen Akbar v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 2:2021cv02846
Petitioner:
Muhammad Jalal Deen Akbar and Muhammad Jalal-Deen Akbar, Sr
Respondent:
U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Muhammad Jalal Deen Akbar, Sr. v. Arthur A. Cappilla et al
as 2:2021cv02000
Defendant:
Arthur A. Cappilla, Warner Brothers Records and Ashanti Publishing Group Fraud
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Jalal Deen Akbar, Sr. and Muhammad Jalal-Deen Akbar, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Muhammad Jalal Deen Akbar v. Arthun A. Cappilla et al
as 2:2020cv07979
Defendant:
Officer Ellwood, U.S. Attorney General, E.B.T. and others
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Jalal Deen Akbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Muhammad Jalal-Deen Akbar v. Unknown
as 8:2019cv01254
Defendant:
Unknown
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Jalal-Deen Akbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad Jalal-Deen Akbar v. Medical Department et al
as 8:2019cv01204
Defendant:
Medical Department and FCI-Lompoc
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Jalal-Deen Akbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akbar v. Wilson
as 4:2018cv00139
Petitioner:
Muhammad Jalal-Deen Akbar
Respondent:
Eric D Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
AKBAR v. USA
as 1:2018cv00017
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMAD JALAL-DEEN AKBAR
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Akbar v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2017cv02089
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Jalal-Deen Akbar
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
