Cases 11 - 20 of 1,673
Murphy v. Officer Kopps(Inmate 1)
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Murphy
Defendant:
Officer Kopps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Herbert v. Marcum et al
as 1:2024cv00932
Plaintiff:
Cedric Herbert
Defendant:
Mark Markums, Mark Marcum, Dalton Dowdy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mitchell v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Mitchell
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Judge Susan E. Edlein, Assistant Solicitor Jamie Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Murphy v. Owens
as 1:2024cv00286
Petitioner:
Andrew Thurston Murphy
Respondent:
Craig D. Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Officer Kopps
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Murphy
Defendant:
Officer Kopps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy v. Wal-Mart Inc
as 2:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Artis W Murphy
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
FORMAN v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE HOWARD FORMAN
Defendant:
NURSE MURPHY, NURSE PITTS and DECATUR COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy-Geiszler et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Taylor Murphy-Geiszler and Joshua Geiszler
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
