Cases 21 - 30 of 122
McDowell v. Randolph County, Alabama et al
as 3:2020cv00839
Defendant:
Joyce Adams, Randy Moore, Angela Price and others
Plaintiff:
Dale McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutledge v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00662
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Reosha Butler and Kay Ivey
Plaintiff:
Roy Murphy Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serratt v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00625
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Smith, Jr., Jonathan Yancy, Roy Murphy Rutledge and others
Defendant:
Warden Butler, Kay Ivey, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Hall et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00323
Defendant:
Nicholas Hall, Ell Deramus, Charles Mosely and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. State of Alabama Department of Labor et al (MAG+)
as 2:2020cv00267
Defendant:
Q.R.C., State of Alabama Department of Labor and Q.R.C. doing business as Applebee's
Plaintiff:
Rodney J. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151
Murphy v. Kendrick (MAG+)
as 2:2020cv00263
Defendant:
Robbie Wright Kendrick
Plaintiff:
Rodney J. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGhee v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv01090
Plaintiff:
Adonnis McGhee and Adonis McGhee
Defendant:
Officer Lester, Joseph Headley, Officer Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGhee v. Headley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv01066
Plaintiff:
Adonnis McGhee and Adonis McGhee
Defendant:
Captain Smith, Joseph Headley, Officer Murphy and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. McClain et al
as 2:2019cv00924
Defendant:
Burrell Freeman, Justin McClain and Murphy Davis
Plaintiff:
Brandon Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broughton v. Murphy et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00780
Plaintiff:
Maurice Gerell Broughton
Defendant:
Victorrus Felder, Anthony L. Murphy and John Crow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
