Cases 21 - 30 of 37
HILCO TRANSPORT, INC. V. MURPHY ENERGY CORPORATION
as 1:2016cv00598
Defendant:
MURPHY ENERGY CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
HILCO TRANSPORT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOINER v. MCSWAIN et al
as 1:2015cv00881
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND JOINER
Defendant:
DEBORAH L. MCSWAIN, BRIAN MURPHY and KATY POOLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY V. NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY, ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00401
Plaintiff:
MARIANNE MURPHY
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY and BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOINER v. POOLE et al
as 1:2015cv00248
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND DAKIM HARRIS JOINER
Defendant:
KATY POOLE, MURPHY and ALICE MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2012cv00102
Plaintiff:
SHMIR AL-MIN MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, THOMAS J. KEITH, JENNIFER MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MURPHY v. BOP
as 1:2011cv01012
Petitioner:
MARIAN MURPHY
Respondent:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MOTHER MURPHY'S LABORATORIES, INC., v. ARRIVALSTAR, S.A., et al
as 1:2011cv00122
Plaintiff:
MOTHER MURPHY'S LABORATORIES, INC.
Defendant:
ARRIVALSTAR, S.A. and MELVINO TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
MURPHY v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv00757
Plaintiff:
BERNARD F. MURPHY
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
MURPHY v. ALLSTATE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2009cv00915
Defendant:
ALLSTATE CORPORATION, ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and ALLSTATE FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff:
OCTAVIUS A. MURPHY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Murphy v. Allstate Insurance Company et al
as 1:2009cv00913
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Financial Services, LLC and Allstate Corporation
Plaintiff:
Octavius A. Murphy
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
