Cases 1 - 10 of 964
Hernandez v. Monti et al
as 3:2024cv01216
Plaintiff:
Jesus Hernandez
Defendant:
Daniel Monti, Christina Vineyard, Dr. Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornille v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01202
Defendant:
Administrative Review Board, William Loy, Percy Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Cornille, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams #218584 v. Otter et al
as 2:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Jeremy J Williams
Defendant:
N Otter, Unknown Valasco, Unknown Bravo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01077
Plaintiff:
Keimon Crayton
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Bob, Ally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Wexford Health Care et al
as 3:2024cv01064
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
Wexford Health Care, Percy Myers, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley Boclair v. Jacqueline Lashbrook, et al
as 24-1539
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BOCLAIR
Defendant:
JACQUELINE LASHBROOK, JOHN R. BALDWIN, BARRY MYERS and others
Myers v. Adams
as 6:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Daniel Alonzo Myers
Defendant:
Warden Robert Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pew v. Hostermon et al
as 1:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Percy Pew
Defendant:
Ray Hostermon, Philip Mattis, Christopher Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott Myers v. Sheriff of Mobile County, Alabama, et al
as 24-10760
Plaintiff:
SCOTT MYERS
Defendant:
SHERIFF OF MOBILE COUNTY, ALABAMA, JACKSON, SAM HOUSTON and others
Olmos #196384 v. Copciac et al
as 3:2024cv08048
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Olmos
Defendant:
Amanda Copciac, Jocelyn Myers, Jeff Gallimore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
